What is a connection attempt? A SYN packet?

A tend to agree with @sebix here... I am seeing all of these change requests and I did not see consensus in the mailing list for them . CC: @amicaross .
I think the goal of this WG is to have a common picture of the values and fields that should exist!
In this light it is less relevant if it's complete or if the wording is 100% for every one (it will never be).
But this common picture is what counts.

A tend to agree with @sebix here... I am seeing all of these change requests and I did not see consensus in the mailing list for them

I assume these are change proposals to be discussed in the next meeting

A tend to agree with @sebix here... I am seeing all of these change requests and I did not see consensus in the mailing list for them . CC: @amicaross .
I think the goal of this WG is to have a common picture of the values and fields that should exist!
In this light it is less relevant if it's complete or if the wording is 100% for every one (it will never be).
But this common picture is what counts.

@smazzucco please send an email to the mailing list with the proposed changes so that we can start the discussion. @sebix @aaronkaplan we will go through all these in the next meeting.

A tend to agree with @sebix here... I am seeing all of these change requests and I did not see consensus in the mailing list for them . CC: @amicaross .
I think the goal of this WG is to have a common picture of the values and fields that should exist!
In this light it is less relevant if it's complete or if the wording is 100% for every one (it will never be).
But this common picture is what counts.

@smazzucco please provide an overview to the ML and start the discussion there in preparation of the discussion during the upcoming meeting